Dbq †Crime and Punishment Essay

Law is good. Man, in his needs, has different motivations for natural rectitude in society. His lay needs require striving for arbitrator, social stability, and punishment. However, in the area of religious influence, law should promote morality so that believers can get close to paragon or be separated and condemned by God. As man and society evolves, the inclination of law has remained the same to punish and deter.Faith is a guarantee for happiness. If ace lives a proper life of morality then rewards await. According to the Old testament (1), God desires a harsh but structured cypher of conduct for man. Man is inherently a selfish and savage creature. Boundaries are necessary in order for society to function lawfully and logically. This negative behavior can be influenced by ultimate punishments capital punishment and condemnation. The POV for the Old Testament is one of tone.The feeling expressed is one of caution. The book of Laviticus stresses behavior and how people m ust be sure that they follow good conduct in order to occupy God. If this behavior goes against morality, then hell and punishment awaits. Also, stated by Ashoka (4), wild pansy and harmony in life can be achieved through proper justice even for the guilty. Hope and reassurance can be displayed, when, judging others, no prejudice is displayed bias against color, religion, status, etc God doesnt.The POV from Ashoka reflects an authorial nature. He believes his rule should bring harmony and peace to his kingdom. Since he is a Buddhist, he depart naturally stress Buddhist ideology in his reign law, military, economic, etcMan uses the law to better himself and society. According to the code of Hammurabi (2), Hammurabi emphasizes the power of the court system when dealing with punishment or justice. When people trust their government to provide fairness and security through legal and policy-making processes and actions, then those people and their nation will be strong economical ly, culturally, etc Han Fei Tzu (3) states that the law applies to everyone.Punishing the rich and noble, as well as common people, shows equality in asociety and creates trust between the people and their government. If biasness is involved with punishment, the people will demand for justice because of the need for fairness and equality in a strong political and social society. Also, according to the Twelve Tables (5), people should take the clock condemnation to negotiate in the judicial system in order to do issues in a civilized manner.All citizens are entitled to a fair and just trial, no matter ones social status. Government creates penalties in alter degrees to match the severities of criminal offence to appear just to society. According to Tahema (6), be good and you will do good in society be bad and you will be punished. Decent behavior is obvious in its actions and rewards. Following what is right leads to obvious rewards physical happiness, social success (job), etc In addition, Beccaria(7) states that punishment should fit the crime law should deter. Fear is a strong motivator it can direct action and words when it comes to how you think and feel.If ones afraid of saying or doing the wrong thing, then one will consider the consequences of their behavior beforehand. Plus, according to John Mill (8), the death penalty is appropriate in some places. The some severe crime of man is punishable by the ultimate penalty the death penalty. For justice to prevail, for the worst of crimes, the judicial system still is burdened of proving the cloaked of character of the defendant. The POV from Mill is one of tone.He displays viciousness in his feelings about the death penalty. Mill is non afraid to play God and judge others not worthy to live. His attitude may be more about revenge than justice. Sometimes justice calls for blood.Based on these documents from reliable sources varied through time periods, there has been no significant change over t ime in the purpose of law. Hammurabi implemented the use of a court system to rule on the legality and punishment of a crime. Also, later in history, the Twelve Tables describe how a court trail works and to negotiate on problems. As time progresses, the secular and religious motivations have gone through no significant changes.A good outside source would be a Supreme lawcourt justice of the Supreme Court in the early 1900s. Because of his experience dealing with the legality and punishment of laws his whole career, we would understand why man strives for justice and whether or not someone deserves punishment.His determination to achieve social stability requires him to inflict the death penalty upon the citizens of his own nation, while also trying to interpret the law in accordance with the society in his time period.In conclusion, law is good. Mans needs have different motivations for law in society. His secular needs require striving for justice, social stability, and punishmen t. However, in the area of religious influence, law should promote morality so that believers can get close to God or be separated and condemned by God. As man and society evolves, the purpose of law has remained the same to punish and deter.